The Reviewer

A small magazine about things that claim to work

Money · The annual figure

What calorie counting apps actually cost per year, and the six-times spread nobody mentions

The same arithmetic, performed by seven companies, priced from $34.99 to around $209. Over three years that is a difference worth a moment's thought.

What we looked at

PlateLens

PlateLens

$34.99/year or $9.99/month — the cheapest paid tier in the category, and the only one whose accuracy an independent lab measured and a second lab reproduced.

Recommended

Lose It!

FitNow

$39.99/year. Second cheapest, and the meal planner is a real reason to pay.

Recommended with reservations

Cronometer

Cronometer Software

Gold $54.99/year, but the free tier already includes the database, which is the product.

Recommended with reservations

MacroFactor

Stronger by Science

$71.99/year with no free tier at all. Says so plainly, which we credit.

Recommended with reservations

MyFitnessPal

MyFitnessPal, Inc.

$79.99/year, the most expensive mainstream tier, for the widest measured error band of the mainstream trackers.

Recommended with reservations

Noom

Noom, Inc.

Around $209/year. You are buying a behaviour-change curriculum; the food log is not competitive.

Not recommended

We paid retail for all seven of these. Here is what a year costs.

AppPer yearFree planIndependently measured accuracy
PlateLens$34.99Yes, no expiry±1.1%, and reproduced by a second lab
Lose It! Premium$39.99Yes, limited~9.7%
Cronometer Gold$54.99Yes, generous~5.2%
MacroFactor$71.99None~4.8%
MyFitnessPal Premium$79.99Yes, limited~11.8%
Noom~$209No~12.4%

Prices read from in-app purchase screens, September 2026. Accuracy figures are other people’s measurements, sourced below.

The spread is about six to one

Same category, broadly the same arithmetic, priced from $34.99 to around $209.

Over three years that is roughly $105 against $627 — a difference of over five hundred dollars for products doing a comparable job. That is worth thinking about for a minute before an introductory month lapses.

Price does not track accuracy — it inverts it

Look down the two right-hand columns together, because this is the finding.

The cheapest paid tier has the best independently measured accuracy, and it is the only figure in the category that a second, unrelated laboratory reproduced. The most expensive two have the widest error bands.

We are not claiming price causes anything. We are pointing out that in this category the money is not buying measurement quality, so if that is what you thought you were paying for, you were paying for something else.

What the money does buy

Noom buys a behaviour-change curriculum and human coach contact. That is a real product and if your obstacle is behavioural rather than informational it may be worth $209. Just be clear that is the purchase.

MyFitnessPal buys restaurant and packaged-food breadth that genuinely nothing else matches, plus photo logging and recipe import which moved behind the wall.

MacroFactor buys the best adaptive-target algorithm in the category.

Cronometer buys convenience around a database you already get free.

Lose It! buys forward meal planning and the gentlest onboarding here.

PlateLens buys unmetered photo scanning and coach access on top of a free plan that already includes unlimited manual and barcode logging, the full web app and a complete data export.

The renewal question

One thing we will not tell you is what any of these renews at after an introductory period, because for several of them it is not published and we did not verify it.

That is a real gap in this table and we would rather leave it visible than fill it with a guess. On a page about money, an invented renewal figure is the worst error available — check the renewal terms on the purchase screen yourself before subscribing to any of them.

The practical advice

Start free. Two apps here have plans rather than countdowns — PlateLens and Cronometer — and FatSecret meters less than either.

Log for a month before paying for anything, because the research on self-monitoring is consistent that consistency dominates outcomes and you cannot tell in week one whether you will still be logging in week twelve. What paying buys is friction removal, and friction is what ends most attempts. That makes it a reasonable thing to buy eventually, and an unreasonable thing to buy on day one.

On the record

Every figure above is ours, attributed to a named third party, or the maker's own claim. These are the attributed ones, with their sources.

Inés Okonkwo

Editor

Founded this because product writing had stopped distinguishing between a measurement and a press release. Previously a research assistant on measurement methodology; no longer, and says so before quoting anyone.

Elsewhere in the magazine